I’ve been bumping up against an interesting bug in Internet Explorer recently, and, having just found the solution, thought I’d share it with you.

The problem is that in Internet Explorer (tested 7 & 8), when your document is in quirks mode, uploading a file sometimes just sends through the file name, without the actual body of the request. Put the document into standards mode, and it all works. It should be noted that this is when you’re dynamically setting up the elements used with JavaScript.

The cause? In quirks mode, the enctype attribute isn’t supported. So whilst setting “encType” on the form element to the correct “multipart/form-data” will indeed set this attribute, it won’t actually cause the upload to include the file. Instead, you need to set the encoding attribute to this value, too. It certainly doesn’t help that the MSDN article on the <input type=”file”> element tells you to set “enctype”, but makes no mention of “encoding”.

I couldn’t find any reference to this problem on the intertubes (although maybe I just didn’t look hard enough), so hopefully this will help someone.

The problem

When styling text <input> elements, it’s fairly common to run into a serious problem: they don’t behave like block-level elements.

Note: In all of the examples, the container element is filled with blue, and the <input> itself is filled with red and has an opacity of 50% so that you can see it under- or over-flowing the container.

<div  style="background: blue; width:200px;">
  <input  style="display:block; padding:4px; background: red; opacity:0.5; border:0;" type="text" value="text input"/>
</div>

You can see how the input doesn’t automatically flow to full width, as the “display: block” style suggests it should. The kneejerk response is to set the width to 100%:

<div  style="background: blue; width:200px;">
  <input  style="display:block; padding:4px; background: red; opacity:0.5; width:100%; border:0;" type="text" value="text input"/>
</div>

But notice now how the input overflows its container’s boundaries because of the left padding. At this point, people may resort to non-semantic markup (removing the padding on the <input> and putting it inside a padded <div>) or JavaScript solutions that set the pixel width whenever the container’s width changes (by the addition of scrollbars, for example).

The (semantic) solution

But wait! There is a way to achieve this effect without resorting to an extra <div> or JavaScript:

<div  style="background: blue; width:200px;">
  <input  style="display:block; padding:4px 0; background: red; opacity:0.5; width:100%; border:0; text-indent:4px;" type="text" value="text input"/>
</div>

Do you see what I did there? I removed the horizontal padding on the <input>, so the 100% width now works correctly, and replaced it with “text-indent”. To the user, this looks no different, and it has the advantage of requiring no extraneous markup or tedious scripting.

Drawbacks

Should the user enter a long string, their text will bump up against the right edge. But I think that that’s a boundary condition that I can live with.
Any vertical borders on the <input> will cause it to overflow its container. Personally, if I want a full-width <input>, though, I generally don’t want any borders on its left or right other than those of its container.

In this post, I will walk through the new columns specification that arrived in CSS 3. I will show you the current implementation state of columns in the four major rendering engines: Gecko (Firefox), Webkit (Safari & Chrome), Trident (Internet Explorer), and Presto (Opera).

Before we get on to platform-specific issues and workarounds, though, we’ll look at the various CSS properties available for working with columns.

For more in-depth information on columns, you should check out the W3C working draft and Mozilla’s MDC page on columns. The Webkit blog also has an article, but it’s not particularly informative.

Browser capabilities

Property	Gecko	Webkit	Trident	Presto
column-count	-moz-column-count	-webkit-column-count	✗	✗
column-width	-moz-column-width	-webkit-column-width	✗	✗
columns	✗	-webkit-columns	✗	✗
column-gap	-moz-column-gap	-webkit-column-gap	✗	✗
column-rule-color	-moz-column-rule-color	-webkit-column-rule-color	✗	✗
column-rule-style	-moz-column-rule-style	-webkit-column-rule-style	✗	✗
column-rule-width	-moz-column-rule-width	-webkit-column-rule-width	✗	✗
column-rule	-moz-column-rule	column-rule	✗	✗
column-span	✗	✗	✗	✗
column-fill	✗	✗	✗	✗
break-before	✗	✗	✗	✗
break-inside	✗	✗	✗	✗

Browsers used for testing: Firefox 3.5.4 (Windows), Safari 4.0.2 (Windows), Internet Explorer 8.0.6001, Opera 10.00 (Windows)

Please let me know if this table is inaccurate, and I will update it.

Browser bugs

These are the bugs that I have encountered using CSS columns — if you know of more, please let me know, and I’ll add them to these lists.

Gecko bugs

Specifying an “overflow” (or “overflow-x” or “overflow-y”) property on an element with columns prevents the column rule from being rendered at all.
Column rules occasionally don’t render, regardless of the “overflow” property.
There is no way to break columns.

Webkit bugs

Pixel creep: Pixels from a later column can creep back to the bottom of the previous column. This can happen with plain text, but it is much more noticeable when you use a non-layout altering effect like text-shadow or box-shadow.
Text that overflows the column horizontally is chopped off
There is no way to break columns.

Properties

column-count

Value: | auto
Initial value: auto

If you don’t set the column-width property, column-count specifies the number of columns into which the content should be flowed.

If you specify column-width, column-count imposes a limit on the maximum number of columns to be rendered if you supply a numeric value.

column-width

Value: | auto
Initial value: auto

This property indicates the optimal column width — columns may be rendered narrower or wider by the UA, according to the available space.

If column-width has the value “auto”, then the width of the columns is determined by other means (for example, column-count).

columns

Value: column-width && column-count

The columns property is a short-hand property, used to set both column-width and column-count simultaneously.

column-gap

Value: | normal
Initial value: normal

Use column-gap to specify the size of the gutter that lies between columns. Most UAs will render “normal” as 1em.

column-rule-color

Value:

When a column-rule is specified, you may use column-rule-color to set the colour for the line drawn between columns. This property is approximately equivalent to the various border-(?)-color properties.

column-rule-style

Value:

By using column-rule-style, you may determine how the line between columns is to be rendered, if at all. Similar to border-(?)-style.

column-rule-width

Value:
Initial value: medium

column-rule-width sets the width of the line rendered in the gutter between columns. Basically, it’s the same as the border-(?)-width properties.

column-rule

Value: column-rule-width && column-rule-style & & column-rule-color

Shorthand for setting all three column-rule properties.

column-span

Value: 1 | all
Initial value: 1

By using column-span, you can allow an element to span either the entire set of columns, or none at all.

Note that you cannot set an arbitrary number of columns to span — this property essentially ‘interrupts’ the column flow and restarts it below the spanned element.

column-fill

Value: auto | balance
Initial value: balance

If you have set a height for your columnified element, setting column-fill to ‘auto’ will cause the columns to be ‘filled’ in turn, rather than have the content balanced equally between them.

I discovered a couple of interesting things about Internet Explorer’s MSXML2.DOMDocument object. It turns out that there are essentially two “production-quality” versions of it available: 3.0 and 6.0. Version 6.0 is much the better version, but it’s quite new, and not available on all systems. This means that in IE7 and IE8, instantiating a new MSXML2.DOMDocument object gives you version 3.0.

Now most of the time, this isn’t a problem. Today, though, I was constructing an XPath expression that used the substring() function; something like this:

//Element[substring(Child, 1, 3)='abc']

This will pull all Elements with a Child element whose value’s first three characters are “abc”. Not particularly complex. It turns out, though, that version 3.0 or the DOMDocument doesn’t actually use XPath as its default language: it uses a bastardised version of XPath called “XSLPatterns”, which just so happens to not support the substring() function at all.

So how do we deal with this situation? One way is to always instantiate version 6.0 of the DOMDocument:

xd = new ActiveXObject('msxml2.DOMDocument.6.0')

The problem with this approach is that, like I mentioned earlier, you can’t always be guaranteed that your users will have version 6.0 installed (even though it’s a free download). The safer way to deal with this problem is to switch the expression language to XPath in your 3.0 object:

xd = new ActiveXObject('msxml2.DOMDocument');
xd.setProperty("SelectionLanguage", "XPath");

The advantage of this approach is that you’re not specifying a version, so when MS eventually changes the default to 7.0 (or whatever), your code will work without a problem.

For more information on this, check out this blog post from Microsoft’s XML team, which goes into a little bit more detail.

Archive for the ‘HTML’ category

HTML: IE file submission

Full-width text inputs without extraneous markup or scripting